EBITDA Performance Review: Waste Management, Inc. vs Thomson Reuters Corporation

Comparing EBITDA growth: Waste Management vs Thomson Reuters

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationWaste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201442890000003509000000
Thursday, January 1, 201531510000003342000000
Friday, January 1, 201629990000003713000000
Sunday, January 1, 201714959308913996000000
Monday, January 1, 201813456860084212000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919134746754344000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202027570000004149000000
Friday, January 1, 202119942964414956000000
Saturday, January 1, 202230100000005466000000
Sunday, January 1, 202329500000005592000000
Monday, January 1, 20245128000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of EBITDA Evolution: Waste Management, Inc. vs Thomson Reuters Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, the EBITDA performance of Waste Management, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation from 2014 to 2023 offers a fascinating glimpse into their financial trajectories. Waste Management, Inc. has consistently outperformed Thomson Reuters Corporation, with an average EBITDA of approximately $4.3 billion, compared to Thomson Reuters' $2.6 billion. Notably, Waste Management's EBITDA surged by nearly 60% over the decade, peaking at $5.6 billion in 2023. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced a more volatile journey, with a significant dip in 2018, reaching a low of $1.3 billion, before rebounding to $3 billion in 2022. This divergence highlights Waste Management's robust growth and resilience, while Thomson Reuters navigated through a period of financial recalibration. As we look to the future, these trends underscore the importance of strategic adaptability in maintaining financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025