SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Cisco Systems, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.

Tech Giants' SG&A: Cisco vs. Pure Storage

__timestampCisco Systems, Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141143700000060652000
Thursday, January 1, 201511861000000184674000
Friday, January 1, 201611433000000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 201711177000000444687000
Monday, January 1, 201811386000000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911398000000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011094000000891175000
Friday, January 1, 202111411000000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 202211186000000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 2023123580000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 2024131770000001197264000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding operational efficiency is crucial. Cisco Systems, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2024, Cisco's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking at approximately $13.2 billion in 2024. This represents a 15% rise from 2014, reflecting Cisco's expansive operational strategies.

Conversely, Pure Storage, Inc., a younger player, has seen its SG&A expenses grow from a modest $60 million in 2014 to nearly $1.2 billion in 2024, marking an exponential increase of over 1,800%. This surge underscores Pure Storage's aggressive market penetration and scaling efforts.

While Cisco's expenses highlight its established market presence, Pure Storage's rapid growth trajectory signals its ambition to disrupt the industry. This comparison offers valuable insights into how different strategies impact financial efficiency in the tech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025