Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Cisco Systems, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.

Cisco vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of R&D Investment

__timestampCisco Systems, Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014629400000036081000
Thursday, January 1, 2015620700000092707000
Friday, January 1, 20166296000000166645000
Sunday, January 1, 20176059000000245817000
Monday, January 1, 20186332000000279196000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196577000000349936000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206347000000433662000
Friday, January 1, 20216549000000480467000
Saturday, January 1, 20226774000000581935000
Sunday, January 1, 20237551000000692528000
Monday, January 1, 20247983000000736764000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Decade of Innovation: Cisco vs. Pure Storage

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, research and development (R&D) expenses are a testament to a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting R&D investment strategies.

Cisco Systems, Inc.

From 2014 to 2024, Cisco's R&D expenses have shown a steady upward trend, increasing by approximately 27% over the period. This growth underscores Cisco's dedication to maintaining its leadership in networking technology. By 2024, Cisco's R&D spending reached nearly $8 billion, reflecting its strategic focus on innovation.

Pure Storage, Inc.

In contrast, Pure Storage, a relatively newer player, has seen its R&D expenses skyrocket by over 1,900% since 2014. Starting from a modest base, Pure Storage's investment in R&D highlights its aggressive push to capture market share and drive technological advancements in data storage solutions.

This comparison offers a fascinating glimpse into how established giants and emerging disruptors allocate resources to fuel their future growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025