__timestamp | AMETEK, Inc. | Pool Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1023344000 | 204752000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1093776000 | 233610000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1007213000 | 277836000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1068174000 | 310096000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1269415000 | 341804000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1411422000 | 370520000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1283159000 | 493425000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1600782000 | 862810000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1820119000 | 1064808000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2025843000 | 786707000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1779562000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the competitive landscape of industrial and consumer goods, AMETEK, Inc. and Pool Corporation have demonstrated remarkable EBITDA growth over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AMETEK, Inc. has seen its EBITDA increase by nearly 98%, showcasing its robust financial health and strategic prowess. In contrast, Pool Corporation, while starting from a smaller base, has achieved an impressive 285% growth in the same period, reflecting its dynamic market expansion and operational efficiency.
This analysis highlights the resilience and adaptability of these companies in navigating economic challenges and capitalizing on market opportunities.
AMETEK, Inc. vs Pool Corporation: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for AMETEK, Inc. and Pool Corporation
AMETEK, Inc. vs Pool Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for AMETEK, Inc. and Pool Corporation
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: AMETEK, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
AMETEK, Inc. and AECOM: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: AMETEK, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: AMETEK, Inc. vs Elbit Systems Ltd.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating AMETEK, Inc. Against U-Haul Holding Company
AMETEK, Inc. vs Saia, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: AMETEK, Inc. vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.