Cost of Revenue Comparison: Waste Management, Inc. vs Ferrovial SE

Comparing cost strategies of Waste Management, Inc. and Ferrovial SE.

__timestampFerrovial SEWaste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411310000009002000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511430000008231000000
Friday, January 1, 201612670000008486000000
Sunday, January 1, 201713450000009021000000
Monday, January 1, 20189850000009249000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199490000009496000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010050000009341000000
Friday, January 1, 2021107700000011111000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022119700000012294000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023112900000012606000000
Monday, January 1, 202413383000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global waste management, two titans stand out: Waste Management, Inc. and Ferrovial SE. Over the past decade, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Waste Management, Inc., a leader in North America, has seen its cost of revenue rise by approximately 40% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its expanding operations and market dominance. In contrast, Ferrovial SE, a European powerhouse, experienced a more modest fluctuation, with a peak in 2017 and a subsequent stabilization.

Key Insights

  • Waste Management, Inc.: From 2014 to 2023, the cost of revenue surged from $9 billion to over $12.6 billion, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy.
  • Ferrovial SE: Despite a peak in 2017, the cost of revenue remained relatively stable, indicating a focus on efficiency and consolidation.

These trends underscore the diverse strategies employed by these industry leaders in navigating the challenges of the waste management sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025