Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Waste Management, Inc. vs Equifax Inc.

Cost Efficiency: Waste Management vs. Equifax

__timestampEquifax Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20148447000009002000000
Thursday, January 1, 20158874000008231000000
Friday, January 1, 201611134000008486000000
Sunday, January 1, 201712107000009021000000
Monday, January 1, 201814404000009249000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201915217000009496000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017374000009341000000
Friday, January 1, 2021198090000011111000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022217720000012294000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023233510000012606000000
Monday, January 1, 2024013383000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of corporate finance, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Waste Management, Inc. and Equifax Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Waste Management has consistently maintained a cost of revenue that is approximately 6 times higher than Equifax's. This reflects the nature of their operations, with Waste Management's extensive logistics and infrastructure needs.

A Decade of Trends

From 2014 to 2023, Equifax's cost of revenue grew by nearly 176%, while Waste Management saw a 40% increase. This indicates a more aggressive expansion or cost increase strategy by Equifax. Notably, in 2023, Waste Management's cost of revenue peaked at over $12.6 billion, while Equifax reached $2.3 billion. These figures highlight the scale and operational differences between the two companies, offering insights into their strategic priorities and market challenges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025