Cost of Revenue Comparison: Global Payments Inc. vs Avery Dennison Corporation

A decade of cost dynamics: Avery Dennison vs. Global Payments

__timestampAvery Dennison CorporationGlobal Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201446791000001022107000
Thursday, January 1, 201543211000001147639000
Friday, January 1, 201643868000001603532000
Sunday, January 1, 201748016000001928037000
Monday, January 1, 201852435000001095014000
Tuesday, January 1, 201951660000002073803000
Wednesday, January 1, 202050482000003650727000
Friday, January 1, 202160955000003773725000
Saturday, January 1, 202266351000003778617000
Sunday, January 1, 202360868000003727521000
Monday, January 1, 202462250000003760116000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global commerce, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's financial health. Over the past decade, Avery Dennison Corporation and Global Payments Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue.

From 2014 to 2023, Avery Dennison's cost of revenue has seen a steady increase, peaking in 2022 with a 53% rise from its 2015 low. This reflects the company's robust growth and strategic investments in its core operations. In contrast, Global Payments Inc. experienced a more volatile journey, with a significant 270% surge from 2014 to 2022, highlighting its aggressive expansion and adaptation to the digital payment revolution.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the industry, where strategic decisions and market conditions play pivotal roles in shaping financial outcomes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025