__timestamp | Snap-on Incorporated | Trane Technologies plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1693400000 | 8982800000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1704500000 | 9301600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1720800000 | 9329300000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1862000000 | 9811600000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1870700000 | 10847600000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1886000000 | 11451500000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1844000000 | 8651300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2141200000 | 9666800000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2311700000 | 11026900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2488500000 | 11820400000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2329500000 | 12757700000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, understanding cost structures is pivotal. Trane Technologies plc and Snap-on Incorporated, two stalwarts in their respective fields, offer intriguing insights into their financial strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Trane Technologies consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $11.8 billion in 2023, reflecting a 32% increase from 2014. This growth underscores their expansive operations and market reach.
Conversely, Snap-on Incorporated, while smaller in scale, demonstrated a steady rise in costs, culminating in a 47% increase over the same period, reaching nearly $2.5 billion in 2023. This trend highlights their strategic investments in innovation and quality. The data reveals a fascinating narrative of growth and adaptation, offering valuable lessons in cost management and operational efficiency for industry leaders and investors alike.
Trane Technologies' cost of revenue is consistently higher, reflecting broader market operations.
Trane Technologies plc vs AerCap Holdings N.V.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Annual Revenue Comparison: Trane Technologies plc vs Snap-on Incorporated
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Trane Technologies plc vs TransUnion
Cost of Revenue Trends: Trane Technologies plc vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Trane Technologies plc vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Cost of Revenue Trends: Trane Technologies plc vs Masco Corporation
Trane Technologies plc vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Trends: Trane Technologies plc vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Trane Technologies plc and Snap-on Incorporated
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Snap-on Incorporated
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Trane Technologies plc Compared to Snap-on Incorporated