Comparing SG&A Expenses: Intuit Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc. Trends and Insights

Intuit vs Pure Storage: SG&A Expense Trends Unveiled

__timestampIntuit Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014176200000060652000
Thursday, January 1, 20151771000000184674000
Friday, January 1, 20161807000000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 20171973000000444687000
Monday, January 1, 20182298000000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192524000000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202727000000891175000
Friday, January 1, 20213626000000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 20224986000000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 202350620000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 202457300000001197264000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Tale of Two Companies: Intuit Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the trends in Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses can offer valuable insights into a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Intuit Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. have shown contrasting trajectories in their SG&A expenses.

From 2014 to 2024, Intuit Inc. has seen a steady increase in its SG&A expenses, growing by over 225%. This reflects its expansive growth strategy and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Pure Storage, Inc. has experienced a more moderate increase of approximately 1,870%, indicative of its rapid scaling and market penetration efforts.

These trends highlight the strategic priorities of each company, with Intuit focusing on sustained growth and Pure Storage on aggressive expansion. As we look to the future, these patterns may offer clues about each company's competitive positioning and market strategy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025