Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Rentokil Initial plc

Cost Efficiency: Westinghouse vs Rentokil Over a Decade

__timestampRentokil Initial plcWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142975000002130920000
Thursday, January 1, 20153102000002281845000
Friday, January 1, 20163761000002029647000
Sunday, January 1, 20174749000002841159000
Monday, January 1, 20185142000003151816000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920990000006122400000
Wednesday, January 1, 202021364000005657400000
Friday, January 1, 202122391000005687000000
Saturday, January 1, 202227370000006070000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239270000006733000000
Monday, January 1, 20247021000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the world of industrial giants, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased contrasting strategies in managing their cost of revenue. Westinghouse, a leader in rail technology, consistently reported higher costs, peaking at approximately $6.7 billion in 2023, reflecting its expansive operations. In contrast, Rentokil, a global pest control and hygiene services provider, maintained a more modest cost structure, with a notable spike in 2019 and 2020, reaching around $2.2 billion. This divergence highlights the distinct operational scales and market strategies of these companies. As we delve into this data, it becomes evident that while Westinghouse's costs are nearly three times that of Rentokil's, both companies have navigated their financial landscapes with unique approaches, adapting to market demands and economic shifts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025