Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Waste Management, Inc. vs Fastenal Company

Cost Efficiency: Waste Management vs. Fastenal

__timestampFastenal CompanyWaste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201418361050009002000000
Thursday, January 1, 201519202530008231000000
Friday, January 1, 201619972590008486000000
Sunday, January 1, 201722269000009021000000
Monday, January 1, 201825662000009249000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928183000009496000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030795000009341000000
Friday, January 1, 2021323370000011111000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022376480000012294000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023399220000012606000000
Monday, January 1, 2024414410000013383000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Tale of Two Giants: Cost Efficiency in Revenue Generation

In the ever-evolving landscape of American industry, Waste Management, Inc. and Fastenal Company stand as titans in their respective fields. From 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased distinct strategies in managing their cost of revenue. Waste Management, a leader in waste services, consistently reported higher costs, peaking at approximately $12.6 billion in 2023. This reflects their expansive operations and the capital-intensive nature of waste management. In contrast, Fastenal, a key player in industrial supplies, demonstrated a more streamlined approach, with costs rising from $1.8 billion in 2014 to around $4.1 billion in 2024. This represents a growth of over 125%, highlighting their efficient scaling. Notably, 2024 data for Waste Management remains elusive, leaving room for speculation on their future trajectory. As these companies navigate economic challenges, their cost efficiency strategies offer valuable insights into industry-specific operational dynamics.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025