Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: International Business Machines Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation

IBM vs. Amphenol: A Decade of Cost Efficiency Trends

__timestampAmphenol CorporationInternational Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014365170000046386000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015378920000041057000000
Friday, January 1, 2016424640000041403000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017470140000042196000000
Monday, January 1, 2018554710000042655000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019560940000026181000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020593480000024314000000
Friday, January 1, 2021747450000025865000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022859480000027842000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023847060000027560000000
Monday, January 1, 20241008300000027202000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Giants: IBM vs. Amphenol in Cost Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and electronics, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Amphenol Corporation have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline, dropping from approximately 46 billion to 27 billion, a reduction of nearly 41%. This trend reflects IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations and cost management.

Conversely, Amphenol Corporation has experienced a steady increase in its cost of revenue, rising from around 3.7 billion to 10 billion, marking a growth of over 170%. This surge underscores Amphenol's expansion and investment in its production capabilities. As these two industry leaders navigate their financial landscapes, their contrasting approaches offer valuable insights into the dynamics of cost efficiency in the tech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025