__timestamp | Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | Trane Technologies plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 38125000 | 2503900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 41990000 | 2541100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 41763000 | 2606500000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 44290000 | 2720700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 45346000 | 2903200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 44002000 | 3129800000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 18436000 | 2270600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 16026000 | 2446300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 24293000 | 2545900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 27913000 | 2963200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 33331000 | 3580400000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Trane Technologies plc and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, Trane Technologies consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at nearly $3 billion in 2019, reflecting its expansive operational scale. In contrast, Expeditors International's SG&A expenses remained relatively stable, averaging around $34 million annually, with a notable dip in 2020. This divergence highlights the differing business models and strategic priorities of these two industry giants. While Trane Technologies invests heavily in administrative and operational functions, Expeditors International maintains a leaner approach, focusing on efficiency. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic financial management in navigating the complexities of the global market.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Trane Technologies plc vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Trane Technologies plc and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Trane Technologies plc and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Trane Technologies plc vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Trane Technologies plc and Pentair plc
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs China Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited Trends and Insights
Trane Technologies plc vs IDEX Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Trane Technologies plc vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Trane Technologies plc and XPO Logistics, Inc.
Trane Technologies plc or Owens Corning: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?