Automatic Data Processing, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison

ADP vs. Stanley Black & Decker: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201426169000001975400000
Thursday, January 1, 201523551000001741900000
Friday, January 1, 201625795000001810200000
Sunday, January 1, 201729272000002196000000
Monday, January 1, 201827629000001791200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935445000001920600000
Wednesday, January 1, 202037697000002004200000
Friday, January 1, 202139316000002345500000
Saturday, January 1, 20224405500000942800000
Sunday, January 1, 20235244600000802700000
Monday, January 1, 20245800000000286300000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Decade of EBITDA: ADP vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial indicator of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) has consistently outperformed Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. in EBITDA growth. From 2014 to 2023, ADP's EBITDA surged by approximately 122%, peaking at $5.8 billion in 2024. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's EBITDA experienced a decline, dropping to $802 million in 2023, a stark 59% decrease from its 2021 high.

Key Insights

  • ADP's Growth: ADP's EBITDA growth reflects its robust business model and strategic investments.
  • Stanley Black & Decker's Challenges: The decline in EBITDA suggests potential operational inefficiencies or market challenges.
  • Missing Data: The absence of 2024 data for Stanley Black & Decker highlights the need for further analysis.

This comparison underscores the importance of strategic planning in maintaining financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025