Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: ADP vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201427624000002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 201524969000002486400000
Friday, January 1, 201626370000002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 201727832000002980100000
Monday, January 1, 201829715000003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201930642000003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030030000003089600000
Friday, January 1, 202130405000003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 202232332000003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 202335514000002829300000
Monday, January 1, 202437789000003310500000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: ADP vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding operational costs is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Over the past decade, ADP has consistently increased its SG&A expenses, peaking in 2024 with a 36% rise from 2014. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's expenses fluctuated, reaching their highest in 2022 before a notable decline in 2023. This divergence highlights differing strategic priorities and market responses. ADP's steady growth in expenses suggests a focus on expansion and innovation, while Stanley Black & Decker's variability may reflect adaptive strategies in a dynamic market. Missing data for 2024 in Stanley Black & Decker's records suggests a need for further investigation into their financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025