Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Waste Management, Inc. or Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

SG&A Cost Management: Waste Management vs. Wabtec

__timestampWaste Management, Inc.Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141481000000324539000
Thursday, January 1, 20151343000000319173000
Friday, January 1, 20161410000000327505000
Sunday, January 1, 20171468000000482852000
Monday, January 1, 20181453000000573644000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191631000000936600000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201728000000877100000
Friday, January 1, 202118640000001005000000
Saturday, January 1, 202219380000001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 202319260000001139000000
Monday, January 1, 202422640000001248000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Waste Management, Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec) have been at the forefront of this financial balancing act since 2014. Over the past decade, Waste Management has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at nearly 1.93 billion in 2022. In contrast, Wabtec's SG&A costs have surged by over 250% from 2014 to 2023, reaching 1.14 billion. This stark difference highlights Waste Management's more consistent approach, while Wabtec's expenses reflect its aggressive growth strategy. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these trends offer valuable insights into strategic cost management. Understanding these dynamics can empower investors and stakeholders to make informed decisions in an ever-evolving market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025