Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Ryanair Holdings plc or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Ryanair vs. Jacobs Engineering

__timestampJacobs Engineering Group Inc.Ryanair Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20141545716000192800000
Thursday, January 1, 20151522811000233900000
Friday, January 1, 20161429233000292700000
Sunday, January 1, 20171379983000322300000
Monday, January 1, 20182180399000410400000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192072177000547300000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202050695000578800000
Friday, January 1, 20212355683000201500000
Saturday, January 1, 20222409190000411300000
Sunday, January 1, 20232398078000674400000
Monday, January 1, 20242140320000757200000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares Ryanair Holdings plc and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2024. Ryanair, known for its cost-effective operations, has consistently maintained lower SG&A expenses, averaging around 420 million annually. In contrast, Jacobs Engineering, a leader in engineering solutions, has averaged nearly five times higher at approximately 1.95 billion.

Key Insights

  • Ryanair's Efficiency: Despite fluctuations, Ryanair's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, peaking at 757 million in 2024.
  • Jacobs' Growth: Jacobs' expenses have shown a steady increase, reaching a high of 2.41 billion in 2022.

This data highlights the strategic differences in cost management between a low-cost airline and a global engineering firm, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025