Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Intuit Inc. or Nutanix, Inc.

Intuit vs. Nutanix: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampIntuit Inc.Nutanix, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141762000000106497000
Thursday, January 1, 20151771000000185728000
Friday, January 1, 20161807000000322758000
Sunday, January 1, 20171973000000577870000
Monday, January 1, 20182298000000736058000
Tuesday, January 1, 201925240000001029337000
Wednesday, January 1, 202027270000001295936000
Friday, January 1, 202136260000001206290000
Saturday, January 1, 202249860000001145122000
Sunday, January 1, 202350620000001156897000
Monday, January 1, 202457300000001178149000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of tech, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Intuit Inc. and Nutanix, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Intuit's SG&A expenses have surged by over 225%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Nutanix has maintained a more stable trajectory, with a 100% increase over the same period.

Intuit's expenses peaked in 2024, reaching nearly 5.73 billion, while Nutanix's expenses remained under 1.2 billion. This stark difference highlights Intuit's expansive approach compared to Nutanix's more conservative strategy. As businesses navigate the post-pandemic landscape, these insights offer valuable lessons in balancing growth with cost efficiency. Which strategy will prove more sustainable in the long run? Only time will tell, but the data provides a fascinating glimpse into the financial strategies of these tech giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025