| __timestamp | International Business Machines Corporation | Zebra Technologies Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 22472000000 | 351518000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 19894000000 | 763025000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 20279000000 | 751000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19680000000 | 749000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19366000000 | 811000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18724000000 | 826000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 20561000000 | 787000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 18745000000 | 935000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 17483000000 | 982000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 17997000000 | 915000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 29536000000 | 981000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, the ability to optimize Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is a hallmark of operational efficiency. This analysis delves into the SG&A cost management of two industry titans: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Zebra Technologies Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.
IBM, a stalwart in the tech industry, has consistently managed its SG&A expenses, with a notable reduction of approximately 20% from 2014 to 2023. This strategic cost management reflects IBM's commitment to maintaining operational efficiency amidst a rapidly changing technological environment.
Conversely, Zebra Technologies, a leader in enterprise asset intelligence, has seen its SG&A expenses nearly triple over the same period. This increase, while significant, aligns with Zebra's aggressive growth strategy and market expansion efforts.
The data reveals a fascinating narrative of contrasting strategies: IBM's focus on cost containment versus Zebra's investment in growth. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, these insights offer valuable lessons in balancing cost management with strategic expansion.
International Business Machines Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue Trends: International Business Machines Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Gross Profit Trends Compared: International Business Machines Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of International Business Machines Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: International Business Machines Corporation vs Western Digital Corporation
Analyzing R&D Budgets: International Business Machines Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
International Business Machines Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Comparing SG&A Expenses: International Business Machines Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing International Business Machines Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing International Business Machines Corporation and VeriSign, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? International Business Machines Corporation or Leidos Holdings, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: International Business Machines Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation