Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of International Business Machines Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.

IBM vs. Check Point: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201438492100022472000000
Thursday, January 1, 201545178500019894000000
Friday, January 1, 201650865600020279000000
Sunday, January 1, 201752539200019680000000
Monday, January 1, 201858979900019366000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201965840000018724000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202068140000020561000000
Friday, January 1, 202170850000018745000000
Saturday, January 1, 202279130000017483000000
Sunday, January 1, 202386410000017997000000
Monday, January 1, 202429536000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: IBM vs. Check Point

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two tech giants: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Over the past decade, IBM's SG&A expenses have consistently dwarfed those of Check Point, averaging around 20 times higher. Notably, IBM's expenses peaked in 2014, with a gradual decline to 2023, reflecting a strategic shift towards cost optimization. In contrast, Check Point's expenses have shown a steady upward trend, increasing by approximately 124% from 2014 to 2023. This divergence highlights IBM's focus on streamlining operations, while Check Point invests in growth. The data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential shifts in strategy. This analysis underscores the importance of balancing operational costs with strategic growth in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025