Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Global Payments Inc. or C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Global Payments vs. C.H. Robinson

__timestampC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Global Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143202130001295014000
Thursday, January 1, 20153587600001325567000
Friday, January 1, 20163750610001411096000
Sunday, January 1, 20174134040001488258000
Monday, January 1, 20184496100001534297000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194978060002046672000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204961220002878878000
Friday, January 1, 20215263710003391161000
Saturday, January 1, 20226034150003524578000
Sunday, January 1, 20236242660004073768000
Monday, January 1, 20246396240004285307000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Global Payments Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Global Payments Inc. saw its SG&A expenses rise by approximately 215%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. experienced a more modest increase of around 100% over the same period. This divergence highlights differing operational strategies, with Global Payments Inc. potentially investing more aggressively in growth initiatives. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, the ability to optimize SG&A costs remains a key differentiator in sustaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025