Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Global Payments Inc. or Clean Harbors, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Global Payments vs. Clean Harbors

__timestampClean Harbors, Inc.Global Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144379210001295014000
Thursday, January 1, 20154141640001325567000
Friday, January 1, 20164220150001411096000
Sunday, January 1, 20174566480001488258000
Monday, January 1, 20185037470001534297000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194840540002046672000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204510440002878878000
Friday, January 1, 20215379620003391161000
Saturday, January 1, 20226273910003524578000
Sunday, January 1, 20236711610004073768000
Monday, January 1, 20247396290004285307000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Global Payments Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Global Payments Inc. saw a staggering 214% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Clean Harbors, Inc. experienced a more modest 53% rise over the same period.

While Global Payments Inc. has expanded its operations, reflected in its rising SG&A costs, Clean Harbors, Inc. has maintained a steadier growth trajectory. This divergence highlights the different operational strategies and market dynamics each company faces. As businesses navigate the complexities of cost management, these insights offer valuable lessons in balancing growth with efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025