Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Cisco Systems, Inc. or Lam Research Corporation

Cisco vs. Lam: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampCisco Systems, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201411437000000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 201511861000000591611000
Friday, January 1, 201611433000000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 201711177000000667485000
Monday, January 1, 201811386000000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911398000000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011094000000682479000
Friday, January 1, 202111411000000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 202211186000000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 202312358000000832753000
Monday, January 1, 202413177000000868247000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Cisco Systems, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation, two titans in their respective fields, have shown distinct strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Cisco's SG&A expenses have seen a modest increase of about 15%, peaking in 2024. In contrast, Lam Research has maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses rising by approximately 42% over the same period. This suggests that while Cisco is expanding its operational footprint, Lam Research is optimizing its cost structure more effectively. The data highlights the importance of strategic cost management in sustaining growth and competitiveness in the tech industry. As these companies continue to evolve, their ability to control SG&A costs will remain a key indicator of their financial health and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025