__timestamp | Cisco Systems, Inc. | KLA Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11437000000 | 384907000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 11861000000 | 406864000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 11433000000 | 379399000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 11177000000 | 389336000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 11386000000 | 443426000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 11398000000 | 599124000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 11094000000 | 734149000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 11411000000 | 729602000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 11186000000 | 860007000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 12358000000 | 986326000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 13177000000 | 969509000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Cisco Systems, Inc. and KLA Corporation, two titans in the tech industry, have shown distinct approaches to optimizing these costs over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2024, Cisco's SG&A expenses have seen a gradual increase, peaking at approximately $13.2 billion in 2024. This represents a 15% rise from 2014, reflecting Cisco's strategic investments in operational efficiency and market expansion.
In contrast, KLA Corporation's SG&A expenses have surged by over 150% during the same period, reaching nearly $970 million in 2024. This sharp increase highlights KLA's aggressive growth strategy and its focus on scaling operations.
Both companies showcase unique strategies in managing SG&A costs, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.
Cisco Systems, Inc. vs KLA Corporation: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cisco Systems, Inc. vs KLA Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Comparison: Cisco Systems, Inc. and KLA Corporation Trends
R&D Insights: How Cisco Systems, Inc. and KLA Corporation Allocate Funds
Cisco Systems, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Infosys Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Cisco Systems, Inc. or Lam Research Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Cisco Systems, Inc. Compared to KLA Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Intel Corporation