SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Rockwell Automation, Inc. and AECOM

SG&A Strategies: Rockwell vs. AECOM Over a Decade

__timestampAECOMRockwell Automation, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014809080001570100000
Thursday, January 1, 20151139750001506400000
Friday, January 1, 20161150880001467400000
Sunday, January 1, 20171333090001591500000
Monday, January 1, 20181357870001599000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191481230001538500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201885350001479800000
Friday, January 1, 20211550720001680000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221473090001766700000
Sunday, January 1, 20231535750002023700000
Monday, January 1, 20241601050002002600000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial automation and infrastructure services, Rockwell Automation, Inc. and AECOM stand as titans. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, these companies have demonstrated distinct strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Rockwell Automation, with its robust presence in the automation sector, has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2 billion in 2023. This reflects a strategic investment in innovation and market expansion. In contrast, AECOM, a leader in infrastructure services, has shown a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses growing from $81 million in 2014 to $160 million in 2024, marking a 98% increase. This careful scaling underscores AECOM's focus on operational efficiency. As these companies navigate the complexities of their industries, their SG&A strategies offer valuable insights into their long-term visions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025