Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Rockwell Automation, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Rockwell vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampRockwell Automation, Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201415701000002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 201515064000002486400000
Friday, January 1, 201614674000002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 201715915000002980100000
Monday, January 1, 201815990000003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201915385000003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014798000003089600000
Friday, January 1, 202116800000003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 202217667000003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 202320237000002829300000
Monday, January 1, 202420026000003310500000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial automation and tools, Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have been pivotal players. Over the past decade, these companies have navigated the complexities of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses with varying strategies. From 2014 to 2023, Rockwell Automation demonstrated a steady control over its SG&A costs, maintaining an average of approximately $1.66 billion annually. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses averaged around $2.94 billion, reflecting a more expansive operational scale.

Interestingly, 2023 marked a significant shift, with Rockwell's expenses peaking at $2.02 billion, while Stanley Black & Decker saw a reduction to $2.83 billion. This fluctuation highlights the dynamic nature of cost management strategies in response to market conditions. As we look to the future, the ability to optimize these costs will remain crucial for maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025