Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Clean Harbors, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Westinghouse vs. Clean Harbors

__timestampClean Harbors, Inc.Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014437921000324539000
Thursday, January 1, 2015414164000319173000
Friday, January 1, 2016422015000327505000
Sunday, January 1, 2017456648000482852000
Monday, January 1, 2018503747000573644000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019484054000936600000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020451044000877100000
Friday, January 1, 20215379620001005000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226273910001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236711610001139000000
Monday, January 1, 20247396290001248000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Comparative Analysis

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding operational costs is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Clean Harbors, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

Over the past decade, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation has seen a significant rise in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.14 billion in 2023, marking a 250% increase from 2014. In contrast, Clean Harbors, Inc. experienced a more moderate growth, with expenses rising by about 53% over the same period, reaching around 671 million in 2023.

Strategic Implications

These trends highlight differing strategic approaches. Westinghouse's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities contrast with Clean Harbors' more conservative cost management. Investors and stakeholders should consider these dynamics when evaluating long-term growth and profitability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025