Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for International Business Machines Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc

SG&A Expenses: IBM vs. Seagate - A Decade of Cost Management

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationSeagate Technology Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201422472000000722000000
Thursday, January 1, 201519894000000857000000
Friday, January 1, 201620279000000635000000
Sunday, January 1, 201719680000000606000000
Monday, January 1, 201819366000000562000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918724000000453000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020561000000473000000
Friday, January 1, 202118745000000502000000
Saturday, January 1, 202217483000000559000000
Sunday, January 1, 202317997000000491000000
Monday, January 1, 202429536000000460000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost Management Insights: A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology giants, effective cost management remains a pivotal factor for sustained growth and competitiveness. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry leaders: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Seagate Technology Holdings plc, from 2014 to 2024.

IBM's Strategic Cost Management

IBM's SG&A expenses have shown a fluctuating trend over the years, peaking in 2024 with a 42% increase compared to 2023. This surge could indicate strategic investments in marketing and administrative capabilities. However, the overall trend from 2014 to 2023 reflects a 20% decrease, highlighting IBM's focus on optimizing operational efficiencies.

Seagate's Consistent Approach

In contrast, Seagate's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a slight decline of 32% from 2014 to 2024. This consistency underscores Seagate's disciplined approach to cost management, ensuring steady financial health amidst market fluctuations.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025