Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: International Business Machines Corporation vs Manhattan Associates, Inc.

IBM vs. Manhattan: A Decade of Revenue Efficiency

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationManhattan Associates, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201446386000000212578000
Thursday, January 1, 201541057000000235428000
Friday, January 1, 201641403000000249879000
Sunday, January 1, 201742196000000245733000
Monday, January 1, 201842655000000240881000
Tuesday, January 1, 201926181000000284967000
Wednesday, January 1, 202024314000000269887000
Friday, January 1, 202125865000000297827000
Saturday, January 1, 202227842000000358237000
Sunday, January 1, 202327560000000430614000
Monday, January 1, 202427202000000470980000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Giants: IBM vs. Manhattan Associates

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and business solutions, the cost of revenue is a critical metric that reflects operational efficiency. From 2014 to 2024, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Manhattan Associates, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in managing their cost of revenue.

IBM, a stalwart in the tech industry, has seen its cost of revenue decrease by approximately 41% over the decade, from a peak in 2014 to a more streamlined figure in 2024. This reduction highlights IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations and possibly a focus on higher-margin services.

Conversely, Manhattan Associates, a leader in supply chain solutions, has maintained a relatively stable cost of revenue, with a slight increase of around 102% from 2014 to 2023. This stability suggests a consistent demand for its solutions, even as the company navigates the complexities of a dynamic market.

The data for 2024 is incomplete for Manhattan Associates, indicating potential changes on the horizon. As these two companies continue to adapt, their cost of revenue will remain a key indicator of their strategic directions and market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025