Analyzing Cost of Revenue: International Business Machines Corporation and Nutanix, Inc.

IBM vs. Nutanix: A Decade of Cost Analysis

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationNutanix, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144638600000060912000
Thursday, January 1, 201541057000000100959000
Friday, January 1, 201641403000000170787000
Sunday, January 1, 201742196000000327331000
Monday, January 1, 201842655000000386030000
Tuesday, January 1, 201926181000000304128000
Wednesday, January 1, 202024314000000286689000
Friday, January 1, 202125865000000291906000
Saturday, January 1, 202227842000000321156000
Sunday, January 1, 202327560000000332187000
Monday, January 1, 202427202000000324112000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: IBM vs. Nutanix

In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and analysts. This chart provides a decade-long comparison of the cost of revenue for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Nutanix, Inc., from 2014 to 2024. IBM, a stalwart in the tech world, has seen its cost of revenue decrease by approximately 41% over this period, from a peak in 2014 to a more streamlined figure in 2024. In contrast, Nutanix, a newer player, has experienced a significant increase of over 400% in its cost of revenue, reflecting its rapid growth and expansion efforts. This divergence highlights the contrasting business models and market strategies of these two companies. As IBM focuses on efficiency, Nutanix is investing heavily in scaling its operations. This analysis offers valuable insights into the financial health and strategic directions of these tech giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025