Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Analog Devices, Inc. vs Workday, Inc.

Cost Efficiency: Analog Devices vs. Workday

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Workday, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141034585000176810000
Thursday, January 1, 20151175830000264803000
Friday, January 1, 20161194236000374427000
Sunday, January 1, 20172045907000483545000
Monday, January 1, 20181967640000629413000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191977315000834950000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019125780001065258000
Friday, January 1, 202127932740001198132000
Saturday, January 1, 202244814790001428095000
Sunday, January 1, 202344283210001715178000
Monday, January 1, 202440458140001771000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Analog Devices, Inc. and Workday, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2024, Analog Devices saw its cost of revenue grow by nearly 300%, peaking in 2022. This reflects its strategic investments and scaling operations. Meanwhile, Workday's cost of revenue increased by approximately 900% over the same period, highlighting its rapid expansion in the cloud computing sector.

Analog Devices maintained a steady growth trajectory, with a notable surge in 2022, while Workday's costs consistently climbed, reflecting its aggressive market capture strategy. By 2024, Analog Devices' cost of revenue was more than double that of Workday, underscoring its larger operational scale. This comparison not only highlights the differing growth strategies but also offers insights into the broader tech industry's dynamics.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025