Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence and Strategy

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationParker-Hannifin Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201422296420001633992000
Thursday, January 1, 201521594390001544746000
Friday, January 1, 201623195920001359360000
Sunday, January 1, 201725685110001453935000
Monday, January 1, 201827199090001657152000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929326020001543939000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033343780001656553000
Friday, January 1, 202133627220001527302000
Saturday, January 1, 202236331500001627116000
Sunday, January 1, 202343417690003354103000
Monday, January 1, 202412814430003315177000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Parker-Hannifin vs Booz Allen Hamilton

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Parker-Hannifin Corporation have showcased distinct trajectories in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 95%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Parker-Hannifin experienced a more modest increase of around 105% during the same period, with a notable spike in 2023. This divergence highlights the strategic differences in operational management between a consulting giant and an industrial leader. As we step into 2024, Booz Allen Hamilton's expenses plummeted by 70%, while Parker-Hannifin maintained a steady course. This data not only reflects their financial strategies but also offers insights into their adaptability in a dynamic market environment.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025