Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Analog Devices, Inc. or Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Analog Devices vs. Cadence Design Systems

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000513307000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000512414000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000520300000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000553342000
Monday, January 1, 2018695937000573075000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019648094000621479000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020659923000670885000
Friday, January 1, 2021915418000749280000
Saturday, January 1, 20221266175000846340000
Sunday, January 1, 20231273584000920649000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400001039766000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor and software industries, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Analog Devices, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. Analog Devices saw a significant increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.27 billion in 2023, a 180% rise from 2014. Meanwhile, Cadence Design Systems maintained a steadier growth, with expenses reaching around 920 million in 2023, marking a 79% increase over the same period. This data suggests that while Analog Devices has expanded its operations, Cadence has managed its growth more conservatively. Notably, 2024 data for Cadence is missing, indicating potential changes in reporting or strategy. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how these companies balance growth with cost efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025