Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

SG&A Cost Strategies: Westinghouse vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142595900000324539000
Thursday, January 1, 20152486400000319173000
Friday, January 1, 20162623900000327505000
Sunday, January 1, 20172980100000482852000
Monday, January 1, 20183171700000573644000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193041000000936600000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203089600000877100000
Friday, January 1, 202132404000001005000000
Saturday, January 1, 202233700000001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 202328293000001139000000
Monday, January 1, 202433105000001248000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2022 with a 30% increase from 2014. However, 2023 saw a notable 16% reduction, indicating a strategic shift. Meanwhile, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies consistently increased their SG&A expenses, with a staggering 250% rise over the same period, reflecting aggressive expansion or investment strategies.

This data highlights the diverse approaches these companies take in managing operational costs, offering insights into their financial strategies and market positioning. As businesses navigate economic challenges, understanding these trends becomes essential for stakeholders and investors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025