Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation or Masco Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Masco vs. Westinghouse: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampMasco CorporationWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141607000000324539000
Thursday, January 1, 20151339000000319173000
Friday, January 1, 20161403000000327505000
Sunday, January 1, 20171442000000482852000
Monday, January 1, 20181478000000573644000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191274000000936600000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201292000000877100000
Friday, January 1, 202114130000001005000000
Saturday, January 1, 202213900000001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 202314810000001139000000
Monday, January 1, 202414680000001248000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Masco or Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies?

In the competitive landscape of industrial giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Masco Corporation consistently outperformed Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation in controlling these costs. Masco's SG&A expenses averaged around 1.4 billion annually, showing a stable trend with a slight dip in 2019. In contrast, Westinghouse's expenses, while lower, increased significantly by 250% over the same period, peaking in 2023. This suggests Masco's strategic efficiency in cost management, maintaining a steady financial course despite market fluctuations. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, Masco's approach offers valuable insights into effective cost control strategies. This analysis underscores the importance of disciplined financial management in sustaining competitive advantage and profitability in the industrial sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025