Cost of Revenue Comparison: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Industrial Giants' Cost of Revenue: A Decade of Change

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201472359000002130920000
Thursday, January 1, 201570998000002281845000
Friday, January 1, 201671397000002029647000
Sunday, January 1, 201779692000002841159000
Monday, January 1, 201890805000003151816000
Tuesday, January 1, 201996367000006122400000
Wednesday, January 1, 202095667000005657400000
Friday, January 1, 2021104230000005687000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022126633000006070000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023116831000006733000000
Monday, January 1, 2024108513000007021000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial manufacturing, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. stand as titans. Over the past decade, these companies have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's cost of revenue surged by approximately 61%, peaking in 2022. Meanwhile, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies saw a remarkable 216% increase, highlighting its aggressive expansion strategy.

A Decade of Growth

In 2014, Stanley Black & Decker's cost of revenue was nearly 3.4 times that of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. By 2023, this ratio narrowed to 1.7, reflecting Westinghouse's rapid growth. This trend underscores the dynamic shifts in the industrial sector, where strategic investments and market demands drive financial outcomes. As these companies continue to innovate, their financial strategies will be pivotal in shaping the future of manufacturing.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025