Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Waste Management, Inc. or Axon Enterprise, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Axon vs. Waste Management

__timestampAxon Enterprise, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014541580001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015696980001343000000
Friday, January 1, 20161080760001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171386920001468000000
Monday, January 1, 20181568860001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192129590001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203072860001728000000
Friday, January 1, 20215150070001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224015750001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234968740001926000000
Monday, January 1, 20242264000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Waste Management, Inc. and Axon Enterprise, Inc. offer a fascinating comparison in this regard. Over the past decade, Waste Management has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at nearly $1.93 billion in 2022. In contrast, Axon Enterprise's SG&A costs have grown more dynamically, increasing by over 800% from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Change

From 2014 to 2023, Axon Enterprise's SG&A expenses surged, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. Meanwhile, Waste Management's expenses remained relatively stable, indicating a focus on operational efficiency. This divergence highlights different strategic priorities: Axon’s investment in expansion versus Waste Management’s emphasis on cost control.

The Bottom Line

Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how companies balance growth and efficiency, a critical consideration for investors and stakeholders alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025