SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Connections, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Waste Management vs. Waste Connections

__timestampWaste Connections, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142294740001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152374840001343000000
Friday, January 1, 20164742630001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175096380001468000000
Monday, January 1, 20185243880001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195462780001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205376320001728000000
Friday, January 1, 20216123370001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226964670001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 20237991190001926000000
Monday, January 1, 20248834450002264000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Waste Giants

In the world of waste management, two titans stand out: Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Connections, Inc. Over the past decade, these companies have demonstrated distinct strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management, Inc. consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at nearly $1.93 billion in 2022. In contrast, Waste Connections, Inc. showed a more dynamic growth, with SG&A expenses rising from approximately $229 million in 2014 to nearly $799 million in 2023, marking a staggering 250% increase. This divergence highlights Waste Connections' aggressive expansion and operational scaling. As the industry evolves, understanding these financial strategies offers valuable insights into corporate efficiency and market positioning. Dive deeper into the numbers to explore how these giants balance cost management with growth ambitions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025