Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Waste Management, Inc. vs United Rentals, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampUnited Rentals, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20147580000001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 20157140000001343000000
Friday, January 1, 20167190000001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 20179030000001468000000
Monday, January 1, 201810380000001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201910920000001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209790000001728000000
Friday, January 1, 202111990000001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 202214000000001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 202315270000001926000000
Monday, January 1, 202416450000002264000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs United Rentals, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Waste Management, Inc. and United Rentals, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their SG&A expenditures.

From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management, Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A costs, peaking in 2022 with a 31% increase from 2014. In contrast, United Rentals, Inc. demonstrated a more dynamic growth, with a staggering 130% rise in SG&A expenses over the same period, reaching its zenith in 2024.

This divergence highlights the strategic differences between the two industry giants. While Waste Management, Inc. maintained a steady approach, United Rentals, Inc. aggressively expanded its operational footprint. Notably, data for Waste Management, Inc. in 2024 remains unavailable, leaving room for speculation on its future financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025