Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Waste Connections, Inc. or Owens Corning

SG&A Cost Optimization: Owens Corning vs. Waste Connections

__timestampOwens CorningWaste Connections, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014487000000229474000
Thursday, January 1, 2015525000000237484000
Friday, January 1, 2016584000000474263000
Sunday, January 1, 2017620000000509638000
Monday, January 1, 2018700000000524388000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019698000000546278000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020664000000537632000
Friday, January 1, 2021757000000612337000
Saturday, January 1, 2022803000000696467000
Sunday, January 1, 2023831000000799119000
Monday, January 1, 2024883445000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Waste Connections, Inc. and Owens Corning, two industry giants, have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Owens Corning's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 71%, while Waste Connections, Inc. saw a staggering 248% increase. This suggests that Owens Corning has maintained a more consistent approach, with expenses rising at a steadier pace. In contrast, Waste Connections, Inc. experienced a sharper increase, particularly noticeable from 2016 onwards. This divergence highlights the different operational strategies and market conditions each company faces. As businesses navigate economic fluctuations, understanding these trends provides valuable insights into corporate efficiency and strategic planning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025