Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? The Boeing Company or Fastenal Company

Boeing vs. Fastenal: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampFastenal CompanyThe Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201411107760003767000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511215900003525000000
Friday, January 1, 201611694700003616000000
Sunday, January 1, 201712828000004094000000
Monday, January 1, 201814002000004567000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201914594000003909000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014274000004817000000
Friday, January 1, 202115598000004157000000
Saturday, January 1, 202217622000004187000000
Sunday, January 1, 202318258000005168000000
Monday, January 1, 202418919000005021000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of aerospace and industrial supplies, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, The Boeing Company and Fastenal Company have showcased contrasting strategies. From 2014 to 2024, Boeing's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2023 with a 38% increase from 2015. Meanwhile, Fastenal has steadily optimized its costs, achieving a 70% rise over the same period. This trend highlights Fastenal's consistent growth and cost management prowess. Boeing, despite its higher absolute expenses, reflects the challenges of the aerospace sector, especially during economic downturns. As we look to the future, these insights offer valuable lessons in strategic financial management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025