Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Eaton Corporation plc or AerCap Holdings N.V.

Eaton vs. AerCap: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAerCap Holdings N.V.Eaton Corporation plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20142999000003810000000
Thursday, January 1, 20153813080003596000000
Friday, January 1, 20163510120003505000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173482910003565000000
Monday, January 1, 20183052260003548000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192674580003583000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202421610003075000000
Friday, January 1, 20213178880003256000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223995300003227000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234641280003795000000
Monday, January 1, 20244077000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Eaton Corporation plc and AerCap Holdings N.V. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Eaton consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, averaging around 3.5 billion annually. However, AerCap's expenses were significantly lower, averaging approximately 338 million, reflecting a leaner operational model.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Eaton's SG&A expenses peaked in 2014, while AerCap saw a notable increase in 2023, reaching its highest at 464 million. This suggests a strategic shift or expansion in AerCap's operations. Despite Eaton's higher expenses, their trend shows a slight decrease, indicating efforts to streamline operations. In contrast, AerCap's expenses have grown by about 55% since 2014, possibly reflecting strategic investments or market expansion.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025