Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Cisco Systems, Inc. or Electronic Arts Inc.

Cisco vs. EA: Who Masters SG&A Costs?

__timestampCisco Systems, Inc.Electronic Arts Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014114370000001090000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015118610000001033000000
Friday, January 1, 2016114330000001028000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017111770000001112000000
Monday, January 1, 2018113860000001110000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019113980000001162000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020110940000001137000000
Friday, January 1, 2021114110000001281000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022111860000001634000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023123580000001705000000
Monday, January 1, 2024131770000001710000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology and entertainment, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Cisco Systems, Inc. and Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) have been navigating this financial terrain since 2014. Cisco, a leader in networking technology, has consistently maintained SG&A expenses around 11% of its revenue, showcasing a disciplined approach to cost management. In contrast, EA, a titan in the gaming industry, has seen its SG&A expenses rise from 1.1% to 1.7% of revenue over the years, reflecting its investment in marketing and development.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2024, Cisco's SG&A expenses have shown a steady trend, peaking in 2024. Meanwhile, EA's expenses have gradually increased, indicating a strategic shift towards aggressive market expansion. This comparison highlights the distinct financial strategies of these industry leaders, offering insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025