Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Automatic Data Processing, Inc. or Lennox International Inc.

ADP vs. Lennox: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Lennox International Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142762400000573700000
Thursday, January 1, 20152496900000580500000
Friday, January 1, 20162637000000621000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172783200000637700000
Monday, January 1, 20182971500000608200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193064200000585900000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203003000000555900000
Friday, January 1, 20213040500000598900000
Saturday, January 1, 20223233200000627200000
Sunday, January 1, 20233551400000705500000
Monday, January 1, 20243778900000730600000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of corporate finance, optimizing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Lennox International Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in managing these costs.

From 2014 to 2024, ADP's SG&A expenses have seen a steady increase, peaking at approximately $3.7 billion in 2024, reflecting a 36% rise from 2014. This growth suggests a strategic investment in administrative capabilities, possibly to support expansion and innovation. In contrast, Lennox International Inc. has maintained a more stable SG&A expense profile, with a modest increase of around 27% over the same period, reaching $730 million in 2024.

These trends highlight differing approaches: ADP's aggressive scaling versus Lennox's conservative cost management. Understanding these strategies offers valuable insights into corporate financial planning and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025