Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? 3M Company or AerCap Holdings N.V.

3M vs. AerCap: Who Masters SG&A Cost Efficiency?

__timestamp3M CompanyAerCap Holdings N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 20146469000000299900000
Thursday, January 1, 20156182000000381308000
Friday, January 1, 20166111000000351012000
Sunday, January 1, 20176572000000348291000
Monday, January 1, 20187602000000305226000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197029000000267458000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206929000000242161000
Friday, January 1, 20217197000000317888000
Saturday, January 1, 20229049000000399530000
Sunday, January 1, 202321526000000464128000
Monday, January 1, 20244221000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost optimization strategies of 3M Company and AerCap Holdings N.V. over the past decade.

From 2014 to 2023, 3M Company consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023 with a staggering 21.5 billion dollars. Despite this, 3M's expenses showed a downward trend of approximately 28% from 2014 to 2020, indicating effective cost management strategies. In contrast, AerCap Holdings N.V. maintained a more stable SG&A expense profile, averaging around 337 million dollars annually, with a slight increase of 55% from 2014 to 2023.

While 3M's expenses are significantly higher, their ability to reduce costs over time suggests a robust optimization strategy. AerCap's steady expenses reflect a different approach, focusing on maintaining consistent cost levels.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025