The Boeing Company or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.The Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201425959000003767000000
Thursday, January 1, 201524864000003525000000
Friday, January 1, 201626239000003616000000
Sunday, January 1, 201729801000004094000000
Monday, January 1, 201831717000004567000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201930410000003909000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030896000004817000000
Friday, January 1, 202132404000004157000000
Saturday, January 1, 202233700000004187000000
Sunday, January 1, 202328293000005168000000
Monday, January 1, 202433105000005021000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Managing SG&A Costs: Boeing vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, The Boeing Company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A management. Boeing's SG&A expenses have generally been higher, peaking in 2023 with a 37% increase from 2014. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest 30% rise over the same period. Notably, 2023 saw a dip in Stanley's expenses, suggesting strategic cost management. While Boeing's higher expenses might reflect its expansive operations, Stanley's consistent control could indicate efficient cost strategies. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing adjustments. As these giants navigate financial landscapes, their SG&A strategies offer insights into their operational priorities and market adaptability.

Short Description

"Boeing vs. Stanley: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management"

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025