SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated

SG&A Efficiency: Rockwell vs. Carlisle's Strategic Approaches

__timestampCarlisle Companies IncorporatedRockwell Automation, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143790000001570100000
Thursday, January 1, 20154619000001506400000
Friday, January 1, 20165320000001467400000
Sunday, January 1, 20175894000001591500000
Monday, January 1, 20186254000001599000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196671000001538500000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206032000001479800000
Friday, January 1, 20216982000001680000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228115000001766700000
Sunday, January 1, 20236252000002023700000
Monday, January 1, 20247228000002002600000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial automation and manufacturing, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated, two industry titans, have shown distinct trends over the past decade.

Rockwell Automation's Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Rockwell Automation's SG&A expenses have consistently increased, peaking at approximately $2 billion in 2023. This represents a growth of nearly 29% from their 2014 figures, indicating a strategic investment in administrative capabilities to support their expanding operations.

Carlisle's Fluctuating Path

Conversely, Carlisle Companies experienced a more volatile trajectory. Their SG&A expenses surged by over 114% from 2014 to 2022, before a notable dip in 2023. This fluctuation suggests a dynamic approach to managing operational costs, possibly reflecting shifts in business strategy or market conditions.

Conclusion

While Rockwell Automation demonstrates a steady increase in SG&A expenses, Carlisle's variable pattern highlights different strategic priorities. These insights offer a window into how these companies navigate the complexities of their respective markets.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025