Cost of Revenue Trends: The Boeing Company vs Emerson Electric Co.

Boeing vs. Emerson: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampEmerson Electric Co.The Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 20141437900000076752000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151325600000082088000000
Friday, January 1, 2016826000000080790000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017886000000076066000000
Monday, January 1, 2018994800000081490000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191055700000072093000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020977600000063843000000
Friday, January 1, 20211067300000059237000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221144100000063078000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023773800000070070000000
Monday, January 1, 2024968400000068508000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue Trends: Boeing vs. Emerson Electric

In the ever-evolving landscape of aerospace and industrial manufacturing, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Over the past decade, The Boeing Company and Emerson Electric Co. have showcased distinct trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, Boeing's cost of revenue has seen a notable decline of approximately 11%, reflecting strategic shifts and market challenges. In contrast, Emerson Electric's cost of revenue has remained relatively stable, with a slight decrease of around 7% over the same period.

Key Insights

  • Boeing's Fluctuations: The peak in 2015, with costs reaching 82 billion, contrasts sharply with the 2021 low of 59 billion, highlighting the impact of global events on aerospace.
  • Emerson's Stability: Despite a dip in 2023, Emerson's cost of revenue has hovered around 10 billion, underscoring its resilience in the industrial sector.

These trends offer a window into the strategic maneuvers and market conditions shaping these industry giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025