Cost of Revenue Comparison: The Boeing Company vs 3M Company

Boeing vs 3M: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestamp3M CompanyThe Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 20141644700000076752000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151538300000082088000000
Friday, January 1, 20161504000000080790000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171600100000076066000000
Monday, January 1, 20181668200000081490000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191713600000072093000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201660500000063843000000
Friday, January 1, 20211879500000059237000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221923200000063078000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231847700000070070000000
Monday, January 1, 20241444700000068508000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of American industry, The Boeing Company and 3M Company stand as titans in their respective fields. From 2014 to 2024, these two companies have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. Boeing, a leader in aerospace, saw its cost of revenue peak in 2015, only to decline by approximately 17% by 2023. This reflects the challenges faced by the aviation sector, including global disruptions and shifting market demands. Meanwhile, 3M, a diversified technology company, experienced a more stable trajectory, with a modest 13% increase in cost of revenue over the same period. This stability underscores 3M's resilience and adaptability in a competitive market. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the strategic maneuvers of these industrial giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025