__timestamp | AMETEK, Inc. | Carlisle Companies Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2597017000 | 2384500000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2549280000 | 2536500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2575220000 | 2518100000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2851431000 | 2941900000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3186310000 | 3304800000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3370897000 | 3439900000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2996515000 | 2832500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3633900000 | 3495600000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 4005261000 | 4434500000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4212484999 | 3042900000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 0 | 3115900000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial manufacturing, AMETEK, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated have been pivotal players. Over the past decade, these giants have showcased intriguing trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, AMETEK's cost of revenue surged by approximately 62%, peaking in 2023. Meanwhile, Carlisle experienced a more modest increase of around 28%, with a notable dip in 2023.
These trends reflect strategic shifts and market dynamics, offering a window into the operational efficiencies and challenges faced by these industry leaders.
Cost of Revenue Trends: AMETEK, Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated
Cost of Revenue Trends: AMETEK, Inc. vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: AMETEK, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
AMETEK, Inc. vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Comparison: AMETEK, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated Trends
AMETEK, Inc. vs RB Global, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: AMETEK, Inc. vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
AMETEK, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
AMETEK, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance